Subscribe now

Letter: No reactor risk

Published 19 June 2004

From Timothy Morris

Your article stating that a jet crash “could kill millions” was scaremongering, and unworthy of your usual standards (29 May, p 8). While you quote the UK Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology’s report as saying “a large plane crashing into a reactor could cause as much radioactivity as the Chernobyl accident”, you provide no evidence of infringements of the restricted areas (RAs) around nuclear facilities by large planes.

RAs are typically 5 kilometres in diameter and 700 metres high, and an infringement would be recorded even if a plane was inside these areas by 30 metres or so. The Ministry of Defence, by your own admission, confirmed only five breaches of the zones by its own aircraft – small fast jets that regularly fly at high speed at an altitude of 50 to 100 metres. Small infringements do sometimes occur due to a split-second miscalculation.

The Civil Aviation Authority’s figures are not broken down by aircraft type or size. But in fact, infringements by large aircraft are unknown: such aircraft proceed on flight plans and are monitored on radar for their entire journey.

You cite two successful prosecutions: one of a balloonist and one of the pilot of a “powered hang-glider”. These are the sort of aircraft that occasionally infringe the RAs, piloted by weekend amateur pilots who occasionally make a mistake. I invite you to reconsider your conclusion that one of these could cause significant damage to a reactor. In fact they would hardly leave a mark.

Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK

Issue no. 2452 published 19 June 2004

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop