Subscribe now

Letter: Bohr isn't wrong yet

Published 7 August 2004

From David Dunstan, Queen Mary, University of London

Shariar Afshar has certainly built an ingenious set-up (24 July, p 30). However, if his double-slit experiment performed as claimed, it would refute classical optics rather than standard quantum mechanics. His grid of fine wires constitutes a diffraction grating, which splits an incident beam into multiple beams at angular separations equal to the angular separation of his pinholes. The image formed of each pinhole is not a single spot, but a row of spots. When both pinholes are open, so that the interference pattern exists, the spots imaged from each pinhole are superposed. A photon detected at one of these spots may therefore have come through either pinhole or, as quantum mechanics demands, through both pinholes.

There is no “which-way” information, and Bohr’s ideas do not need to be thrown on the scrap-heap just yet. Afshar has not succeeded where Einstein failed.

London, UK

Issue no. 2459 published 7 August 2004

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop