Subscribe now

Letter: Ill winds

Published 4 May 2005

From John Etherington

David Suzuki implies that the opposition to wind farms is largely down to their impact on landscape (16 April, p 20). He has missed the point: much of the outcry stems from two matters of greater concern.

First, wind power will never contribute significantly to controlling concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Secondly, attempts to force energy generated by wind power onto the grid will impose serious unreliability or will negate much of the promised saving of CO2 emissions by requiring “shadow” back-up generation.

The 2004 Consultation on the Review of the Climate Change Programme of the UK’s Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs recognises that by 2010, renewable electricity generation will save 2.5 megatonnes of carbon emissions per year at most. This is much less than a thousandth of the global emission, and an infinitesimal fraction of the quantity that needs to be removed from oceans and atmosphere to meet the guidelines set by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to reduce the atmospheric concentration of CO2 by a third.

It is a good idea to stop burning fossil fuel and to avoid further unnecessary carbon emission, but I am afraid wind power isn’t a viable alternative. Suzuki will have sacrificed his view for less than nothing, and most of us like such views as they are.

From Paul Cairns

The fact is that we live in a society with an insatiable demand for energy. When quizzed, most people are unequivocally against compromising any aspect of their lifestyle to cut their demand on our resources. So it has to be asked: why compromise our crowded islands’ wild landscapes to find a futile fix for pampered lifestyles?

Like an overweight compulsive eater who hopes that the odd piece of crispbread thrown down the hatch alongside plates of chips will somehow make them slim, we are kidding ourselves with low-yield energy technologies. We must move away from our obsession with generation and start bearing down on demand. Lean technologies only make sense alongside lean consumption.

Halifax, Yorkshire, UK

Llanhowell, Pembrokeshire, UK

Issue no. 2498 published 7 May 2005

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop