Subscribe now

Letter: Selective miscarriages

Published 1 June 2005

From Matt Carroll

It is intriguing that the sex ratio at birth of human populations might be affected by psychological stress, but I find Ralph Catalano’s evolutionary interpretation hard to swallow (30 April, p 19).

The study demonstrated a statistically significant increase in pre-term mortality of male fetuses in California following the 11 September attacks. Catalano is quoted as suggesting that this might be an evolved mechanism for culling weak males “in the interests of the herd”.

For very good reasons, “group selection” explanations have fallen drastically out of favour among evolutionary biologists since the 1960s, and have been replaced by theories working at the level of individual or gene selection. A strategy of selective miscarriage might evolve if it pays mothers to produce strong, healthy sons, or if mothers carrying male fetuses are more likely to suffer in times of stress.

Nottingham, UK

Issue no. 2502 published 4 June 2005

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop