Subscribe now

Letter: Mission delayed

Published 28 September 2005

From Phil Stracchino

David Getling wonders issue why it is that with 35 years of experience and vastly improved technology, George W. Bush picked a target date 16 years out to return to the moon, when it only took eight years to get there in the first place (3 September, p 19).

The answer, I think, is very simple: Bush intentionally picked a date far enough out that even if he was somehow permitted a third term, there would still be practically zero chance that he would ever have to make good on it.

I will go out on a limb and make a prediction that a commercial, private-sector spaceflight company will land a man on the moon long before a US government programme manages to do so again.

Theoretically, the replacement for the Shuttle is supposed to fly by 2011. I will be surprised if it’s even off the drawing boards by then, unless NASA just buys commercial, off-the-shelf hardware — which might well actually be its best bet.

Hudson, New Hampshire, US

Issue no. 2519 published 1 October 2005

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop