Subscribe now

Letter: Different languages

Published 22 February 2006

From Andrew Macara

I do not believe art and science have a common language – and they never will (4 February, p 50). Because an artist like Jackson Pollock painted a picture that may have some fractal properties it is assumed this provides a connection with science. Other painters have composed works using atoms and molecular structures as a subject, and such artists have stated that this brings science and art together. Well it does no such thing. I am a full-time artist and have painted many oils over 40 years, using football, tennis and other sports as subject matter. Can I therefore say that art and sport are closely connected? In my opinion, no.

Derby, Derbyshire, UK

Issue no. 2540 published 25 February 2006

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop