Subscribe now

Letter: Nuclear longsight

Published 5 April 2006

From Warren Bullock

I am troubled by one thing in your article on permanent waste disposal: the timescale involved surely invalidates some of the audacious assumptions that underpin such projects (4 March, p 38). Climate change and the rise and fall of nations – for which there are arguably no effective countermeasures – are two factors guaranteed to occur during the 100,000-year period described.

The designers of these repositories should also plan for the sites to be “relocation-ready”, so that when conditions change, as they will, the cost of doing this is minimised.

In just a few hundred years our descendants will start looking at using their various space elevators as a cheap, efficient means of sending Earth’s most hazardous material on a one-way trip to the sun. A bit of forward thinking when designing repositories (multiple shafts, redundant access points, transportable containers) will put them in a better position to clean up our nuclear mess.

Singapore

Issue no. 2546 published 8 April 2006

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop