Subscribe now

Letter: Driven to distraction

Published 15 November 2006

From Michael Paine, Beacon Hill, New South Wales, Australia

Paul Marks quite rightly points out the risk to drivers of too many on-board warning systems and the confusion from head-up displays (28 October, p 30). However, I have been trialling an Australian invention that uses GPS and a clever method of storing speed-zone information to alert drivers, with a simple beep, when they exceed the speed limit. It also announces school zones and speed camera locations.

I have found this an excellent driving aid. I do not need to look at a screen – I simply decrease my speed until the beep stops. If I do get confused about the current speed limit I glance at the screen. This is actually less of a distraction than looking around for roadside speed limit signs on unfamiliar roads.

Ten years ago I carried out research on this topic for the New South Wales government. I concluded that the absence of speed advisory systems is a glaring oversight: at least 40 per cent of serious accidents involve one vehicle exceeding the speed limit shortly before the collision.

The editor writes:

Fair point, but adding more machines that go beep surely only adds to the problem. Imagine a lane departure alarm and a pedestrian detector beeping at the same time – this übercool GPS speed alarm would not only cause confusion, it would be swamped.

Issue no. 2578 published 18 November 2006

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop