Subscribe now

Letter: Nanohazardicity

Published 15 November 2006

From Joel Veitch

I am somewhat perturbed by this whole nanohazard malarkey (Feedback, 4 November). There does not appear to be an SI unit of hazard, and so the precise amount of hazard constituted by a nanohazard is as yet undefined. A quick look at the reports available from the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents at www.hassandlass.org.uk/query/reports.htm informs us that in 2002, 4080 accidents were caused in the home by a curtain.

This would seem to present a good candidate for an SI unit – many people are exposed to a curtain on a regular basis, and 4080 accidents annually constitutes a significant level of hazard. I therefore propose the curtain as the SI unit of measurement for hazard.

Interestingly, a very quick scan through the statistics reveals that an air bed or lilo constitutes a hazard of almost exactly 1 centicurtain. The data set is large enough only to measure hazards down to 5 millicurtains – the hazardicity of an artist’s brush.

If we had a study of a billion people, and found precisely one instance of a particular home injury in one year, then we would have found a 1 nanocurtain hazard. We could then finally place a nanohazard warning sign upon the item, to alert the populace to its level of hazard.

I implore the government to commission such a study as a matter of urgency.

London, UK

Issue no. 2578 published 18 November 2006

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop