Subscribe now

Letter: Scale relativity

Published 25 April 2007

From Anthony Cutcliffe

Discussing the possibility that the universe is fractal, Amanda Gefter makes a small reference to Laurent Nottale’s theory of Scale Relativity (10 March, p 30). But she goes nowhere near doing the theory justice.

The basic concept adds scale invariance to Einstein’s general theory of relativity. The consequence is a minimum length (a quantum length), the Planck length, which cannot be further reduced. The Planck length has a similar role to the speed of light in general relativity as an asymptote that can be approached but never reached.

Among other things, Nottale’s theory:

1) Combines general relativity and quantum mechanics: Quantum mechanics becomes a manifestation of the fractal geometry of space-time in the same way gravity is in Einstein’s general theory of relativity a manifestation of the curvature of space-time.

2) Removes problems in big bang theory and shows inflation is unnecessary.

3) Explains the transition of quantum effects to classical ones – it is all about scale as your article “Forever quantum” concludes (17 March, p 36).

4) Removes the various infinities that require “re-normalisation” that crop in quantum mechanics.

5) Makes testable predictions about the masses of various quarks and other particles, the value of the cosmological constant and numerous other predictions

I do not understand why Nottale’s theory has not been given wider coverage or discussion. If he is wrong it needs debunking, if he is right he deserves a Nobel prize.

Singapore

Issue no. 2601 published 28 April 2007

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop