Subscribe now

Letter: Time's up

Published 9 April 2008

From Julian Barbour

Amanda Gefter writes, almost correctly, that I proposed that “time must not exist in a quantum theory of the universe” (19 January, p 26). Replace “must not” with “probably does not” and I agree. I think Peter Fyfe is right to alert would-be time travellers to this possibility (15 March, p 23), but I do not deny the existence of “any time but the present”.

In my view, all possible instants – the present one and umpteen others – exist on an equal footing, in much the same way that mathematicians say the integers do. Moreover, if quantum mechanics really is universal, I think the belief that you did actually experience what you call past instants commits you to a form of many-worlds interpretation. I call it the many-instants interpretation.

South Newington, Oxfordshire, UK

Issue no. 2651 published 12 April 2008

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop