Subscribe now

Letter: Beyond the Palin

Published 3 December 2008

From Phil Stracchino

Lawrence Krauss heaps scorn on Sarah Palin for her “outlandish claim” that the vice-president is in charge of the Senate (1 November, p 48), and casually parrots the oft-repeated claim that she couldn’t name a single important US Supreme Court decision other than Roe v Wade.

One duty of the vice-president is to be president of the Senate – and it is their responsibility to cast a tie-breaking vote there. Interviewer Katie Couric in fact asked Sarah Palin whether she could name any Supreme Court decisions other than Roe v Wade with which she disagreed, not just any decision.

Gilford, New Hampshire, US

Issue no. 2685 published 6 December 2008

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop