Subscribe now

Letter: Probes rule

Published 17 March 2010

From Neil Seymour

Why the obsession with astronauts (13 February, p 8)?

NASA’s main achievements have been launching, repairing and upgrading satellites such as the Hubble Space Telescope and sending probes to the far reaches of the solar system.

It is true that the Apollo missions told us much about the moon, but this was mainly a cold-war exercise in one-upmanship, with scientific knowledge as a spin-off.

The two Mars rovers and the Mars orbiter have achieved far more than any crewed expedition could have dreamed of. Probes to Jupiter, Saturn and beyond have revealed more than any astronaut could, without the problems of keeping people alive in space for years.

NASA has a bright future in front of it without sending people to the moon, Mars, an asteroid or indeed any other solar system object. What, apart from razzmatazz and an almost bottomless budget deficit, would such crewed missions accomplish?

Sending ever-smarter probes into space is the sensible approach and will gain us the greatest insights.

Poole, Dorset, UK

Issue no. 2752 published 20 March 2010

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop