Subscribe now

Letter: Intended dissonance

Published 25 August 2010

From Derek Bolton

Philip Ball’s article on the universality of music touches on the debate over a purported universal preference for consonance, quoting Josh McDermott as saying that some non-western cultures use what a westerner might consider “dissonant tuning” (8 May, p 30). This dissonance sometimes matches the special timbres of the instruments involved, such as those in a gamelan orchestra, which are very slightly out of tune with each other to produce what is considered a shimmering musical sound.

The obvious basis for the appeal of music is the human voice. One might dismiss that on the grounds that the voice should therefore be widely regarded as the pinnacle of music, but that does not follow. It is only necessary that whatever is instinctively the most musical is closer to the human voice than to most other naturally occurring sounds.

The human voice only makes one pitch at a time, but there are harmonics. A preference for consonance may therefore be a preference for one voice over many in discord. It would be interesting to analyse the pitches of two people talking “harmoniously”, in contrast to the same two arguing.

Sydney, Australia

Issue no. 2775 published 28 August 2010

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop