Subscribe now

Letter: Bohm's a way

Published 23 March 2011

From Eric Van

It seems grossly premature to declare a victory for Niels Bohr in his great debate with Einstein over the meaning of quantum mechanics (26 February, p 36).

Yes, the violation of Bell’s inequality in experiments by Alain Aspect and others appears increasingly likely to rule out “local realism”, Einstein’s favoured interpretation. But many physicists – going back to John Bell himself – would put their money on the eventual acceptance of a non-local hidden-variable theory such as David Bohm’s. And if that proves to be the case, then Einstein was correct about realism, correct about determinism (versus inherent randomness), but wrong about locality – while Bohr was wrong on all three counts.

Watertown, Massachusetts, US

Issue no. 2805 published 26 March 2011

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop