Subscribe now

Letter: Two become one

Published 20 March 2013

From Mary Midgley

Your special issue on the self repeats the errors of earlier thinking (23 February, p 32). The contributors give us a string of straw men – views such as “we regard ourselves as unchanging” (p 34). They say these are central to our idea of ourselves, but actually they are just a continuation of parts of the argument by 17th-century philosopher René Descartes for a separate, substantial soul.

Finding it easy to class these views as illusions, the writers then provide a source for them. They imply, by using words like “tricked” and “elaborate”, that some conjuror – probably “the mind” or “the brain” – has played the part of Descartes’s deity-like Great Deceiver. Such drama would only make sense inside Descartes’s dualist world of separate mind and body, a place that we no longer need to visit.

Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Issue no. 2909 published 23 March 2013

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop