Subscribe now

Letter: Climate talk

Published 16 October 2013

From Jon Atack

I am writing in response to Corner’s take on the ineffective communication of climate science. We are all subject to confirmation bias, whereby we favour evidence that supports our existing feelings. Further, when strongly held views are challenged, cognitive dissonance is invoked – a feeling of mental discomfort that discourages a change of heart.

It might be helpful to start teaching in schools not only about devastating climate change, but also about our susceptibility to subconscious and exploitative persuasion, so that we could appreciate reason above propaganda. Now that would be environmentally friendly.
Radcliffe on Trent, Nottinghamshire, UK

Issue no. 2939 published 19 October 2013

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop