Subscribe now

Letter: Coal clarification

Published 12 March 2014

From Harry Bradbury

Fred Pearce’s article on underground coal gasification (15 February, p 36) misrepresents both the science and the words of explanation given by three of the directors of UK energy firm Five-Quarter on its method of obtaining unconventional gas from rocks.

Five-Quarter’s process – called “deep gas winning” – involves different chemical processes from the endless references to “burning coal” – namely partial-oxidation and pyrolysis, gasifying both coal and the kerogen in the surrounding rock within a carefully-created finite chamber, with all gases captured and none released to the atmosphere.

Pearce quotes Bradbury on the subject of underground coal, saying: “We want to burn it where it sits to revive industry.” We did not use and would never use the term “burn”. Burning coal would be a wasteful, dangerous and pointless use of this complex and valuable energy source, as was clearly pointed out.
Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Dermot Roddy and Paul Younger, Five-Quarter

Issue no. 2960 published 15 March 2014

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop