Subscribe now

Letter: Define crime

Published 29 October 2014

From Andreas Keller

The “pro-surveillance mantra” you mention – “if you have nothing to hide, you’ve got nothing to worry about” – is indeed stupid (11 October, p 5). Governments can redefine what constitutes a crime, and may say this includes holding a certain opinion or belonging to a certain minority.

Where I live, 70 years ago it was a death-penalty “crime” to be a Jew. In a democracy, only the people should be able to decide what is a crime, but strong surveillance tools in the hands of a government undermine that same democracy. This is the way into dictatorship.
Cologne, Germany

Issue no. 2993 published 1 November 2014

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop