Subscribe now

Letter: The trouble with tiny demons

Published 6 July 2016

From Paul G. Ellis

Stephen Battersby uses Maxwell's demon to discuss the physical nature of information (14 May, p 28). But how can the demon “see the motions of air molecules” or operate “a frictionless door” or “slide a partition” without some physical interaction?

Surely, any useful modern analysis has to include the demon's use of photons or the like (which are subject to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle) to measure molecules' momentum vectors in order to determine whether they should pass into a hotter location. Similarly, some account is needed of the physical interaction involved in operating the door or inserting a partition.

Battersby mentions Leo Szilard's approach to the thought experiment. Though Szilard estimates the molecule's work of pushing a partition, he appears to me to ignore the physics both of the initial insertion of the partition and of the demon measuring which end the molecule is in.

Chichester, West Sussex, UK

Issue no. 3081 published 9 July 2016

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop