Subscribe now

Letter: This letter does not in fact describe itself

Published 7 June 2017

From Chris deSilva, Dianella, Western Australia

Brian Smith asks whether the word “heterological” is self-descriptive and thus autological, or heterological and non-self descriptive (Feedback, 22 April). The question was discussed by the German mathematician Kurt Grelling in 1908 and is known as the Grelling-Nelson paradox.

As Feedback notes (20 May) it is one of a class of self-referential paradoxes. Probably the oldest of these is the statement of Epimenides the Cretan that “all Cretans are liars”. A more direct example is the sentence “this sentence is false”, which is the centrepiece of Kurt Gödel's proof of the inconsistency of complete logical systems – and thus an inspiration for Alan Turing's definition of computing.

My answer to the question about the word “heterological” is simple: it is neither autological or heterological but paradoxical.

Issue no. 3129 published 10 June 2017

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop