Subscribe now

Letter: Unfounded apocalyptic claims harm climate action

Published 23 October 2019

From Gabriel Carlyle, St Leonards-on-Sea, East Sussex, UK

Graham Lawton describes the oft-repeated “fact” that we have 11 years to save the planet as “a subtle misrepresentation of the science” (12 October, p 22). Other misrepresentations are less subtle. For example, Extinction Rebellion co-founder Roger Hallam claimed on the BBC HARDtalk programme in August that “science predicts” that 6 billion people will die this century because of climate change if we continue on our current trajectory. This claim was audited by Climate Feedback, a worldwide network of scientists that sorts fact from fiction in climate change media coverage. It concluded that Hallam’s assertion was “not supported by published research” (bit.ly/2pcKwis).

I agree with Lawton that the current surge in activism around climate change is “a long-overdue outbreak of sanity”. But unfounded, apocalyptic claims risk undermining the long-term health of these movements.

Issue no. 3253 published 26 October 2019

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop