Subscribe now

Letter: Going cold on a new definition of life

Published 20 May 2020

From James Veale, Cambridge, UK

Hillary Shaw suggests a definition of what constitutes life (Letters, 25 April). It is defined as “a bounded system containing a readable information code that can locally decrease entropy”. This seemed to me to succinctly encapsulate all forms of life that we know about, and reduced a complicated concept to a simple idea in a really satisfying way – I liked it a lot.

Then, two weeks later, I opened my fridge and realised that it, too, decreases entropy locally and contains readable (binary) information that tells its “body” how to do it – how annoying! Can we extend the definition to exclude systems that were created by other readable information-encoded, entropy-decreasing systems?

Perhaps we could, but while such an extension would rule out fridges, I assume it would also exclude babies and genetically modified organisms. I fear I may be back to square one.

Issue no. 3283 published 23 May 2020

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop