Subscribe now

Letter: Reasons why our reality probably isn't simulated

Published 1 July 2020

From Guy Cox, Sydney, Australia

Nick Bostrom’s reprinted article, which discussed the idea that our reality may be a simulation, doesn’t begin promisingly when he says “we are made of the same stuff as mud” (6 June, p 46). Well, not so much – the essential components of mud are alumino-silicate clay minerals and these play no part in the mammalian body.

I take it that the article was written, if not as a joke, then at least as a jeu d’esprit to provoke discussion, so I won’t go through all the logical inconsistencies. But I will point to the pachyderm on the premises. No civilisation living on a planet in a solar system (and we don’t know of anywhere else a civilisation could live) could obtain enough energy to run such a simulation, at least not without destroying their solar system.

So we can be pretty confident we aren’t living in a simulation.

Issue no. 3289 published 4 July 2020

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop