From Andrew Glassner, Seattle, Washington, US
Your article contrasting two types of leadership – prestige and dominance – emphasised style over substance (4 July, p30). Someone’s past and promised actions and agenda are important criteria when people consider that person for leadership. I would hope many would reject a leader who denied science, vilified immigrants and placed children in cages, be they dominant or prestige. In the end, actions should have a more broad and enduring impact than the style a leader adopts.
