Subscribe now

Letter: On the transition to a greener energy world (1)

Published 18 August 2021

From Robert Deuchar, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, UK

In your extended look at how to transform our energy system to a climate-friendly one, nuclear power doesn’t make the cut (7 August, p 34).

It should. For starters, Rolls-Royce is leading a consortium to produce small modular nuclear reactors producing about 450 megawatts each. It says that they could be operating in the early 2030s at a cost comparable with renewables such as wind.

In addition, you report a “lack of public and political support” for nuclear, but another technology, thorium-powered nuclear, may offer a way to address this. This is inherently safe as the reaction needs a beam of neutrons, so if there is a problem the beam can be turned off.

The public should be persuaded that thorium can be a major electricity generator in the medium term. Relying on wind and solar is putting all your eggs in one basket. Four major sources would be good: wind, solar, modular (uranium) nuclear and thorium nuclear.

Issue no. 3348 published 21 August 2021

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop