From John Reynolds, Canonbie, Dumfriesshire, UK
The article about AI and the crystalline structures it can “predict” is responsibly tempered with information about the accuracy of the results and concerns about the practicality and stability of these materials (2 December, p 8).
This raises a question of language: at what point do we anthropomorphise AI? When do we say, “the crystals that AI can imagine“, as a way of acknowledging that, whether from humans or AIs, exciting ideas are ten-a-penny?
