Subscribe now

Letter: Mars colony: it would be a valuable back-up plan

Published 23 December 2024

From Len Mann, Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire, UK

I have digested the explanations for why trying to live on Mars is a bad idea. Very good points are made, but one important thing is missed. One day, a disaster will befall Earth that will most likely wipe out the human race. It might be an extinction type asteroid impact, a nuclear war, a pandemic, global warming or something we haven’t thought of yet. If you think we should do our very best to preserve our species, then I believe that Mars is pivotal (16 November, p 48).

We don’t even need to fully colonise it. When visiting Mars, people would need to stay for at least a year because of orbital dynamics. A transient colony of a few thousand could be maintained on an ongoing basis. At least then we would have the possibility of recolonising Earth after a disaster.

Issue no. 3523 published 28 December 2024

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop