Subscribe now

Letters archive

Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com


1 March 2023

All hail energy saving, now let's look at water

From Maria Felice, Bristol, UK

I thoroughly enjoyed reading your feature on the 2000-watt energy-saving challenge( 11 February, p 36 ). We now need something similar for water consumption. There are few tools to track usage and not that much talk about it. Shouldn't we give water use the attention it deserves, or, like energy, are we going to leave …

1 March 2023

Floating eyes in the sky are really nothing new at all

From Steve Johns, Axedale, Victoria, Australia

I find it amazing that it has taken China and the US until now to think of spying on each other using flying objects. I suggest the outrage may be manufactured for immediate political ends( 11 February, p 9 ).

8 March 2023

The shift to farming gets my vote as a force for good

From Frank Aquino, Perth, Western Australia

Was the shift to farming really the worst mistake in human history, asks Michael Marshall, concluding that the claim is at best an exaggeration. I would go further, drawing on relevant points made by the researcher Jacob Bronowski( 25 February, p 28 ). You can't civilise on the move. No group of humans has ever …

8 March 2023

New climate technology would be a NET gain

From Stuart Lambert, London, UK

To argue that a focus on negative emission technologies (NETs) is slowing the fight against climate change is to fall into a common trap. A look at plans drawn up to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement will tell readers that NETs are a baked-in requirement for meeting the 1.5°C pathway( 18 February, p …

8 March 2023

The rapidly diminishing need for dark matter (1)

From William Hughes-Games, Waipara, New Zealand

Surely, every time we find a new source of normal matter, this decreases the amount of dark matter we must hypothesise to explain the behaviour of galaxies( 11 February, p 46 ). One recent example is the discovery that there are far more red dwarfs than we thought. There are other candidates, too. How about …

8 March 2023

The rapidly diminishing need for dark matter (2)

From Troy Braswell, Rancho Palos Verdes, California, US

We know that one form of energy without matter is the photon. Could it follow that gravity without matter is the graviton? Could free gravitons, still exerting a pull, explain the gravitational effects of dark matter?

8 March 2023

Future Homes for all seems a long way off

From Rachel Mckeown, Cambridge, UK

One day, I hope to be able to have a "Future Home" of my own and reap the energy-saving benefits. However, houses are built to last, so the vast majority of homes won't be replaced soon. Green technology has to make its way into current homes, with better incentives to retrofit, replacing energy and carbon-intensive …

8 March 2023

Rivers campaign: Lack of investment landed us in it

From Dyane Silvester, Arnside, Cumbria, UK

I passionately support your campaign, together with the i newspaper, to highlight the state of the UK's rivers( Leader, 18 February ). Their current deplorable condition is surely down to the years, if not decades, of chronic underinvestment. For example, the UK government has left the Environment Agency without adequate resources to inspect and monitor …

8 March 2023

Could veterinary advance explain tick results?

From Stephanie Woodcock, Carnon Downs, Cornwall, UK

It was always going to be a big ask to remove sufficient ticks from a semi-forested US area to truly affect Lyme disease rates for people. And yet, the rate of disease among pets did fall significantly. One possible explanation might be the fact that there is a vaccine for pets, but not people( 18 …

8 March 2023

Drastic energy saving is entirely possible

From Talia Morris, Cape Tribulation Tropical Research Station, Queensland, Australia

Your 2000-watt challenge article seems overly pessimistic about the difficulty of cutting energy use. We run our research station, with 12 buildings, on around 14 kilowatt-hours a day, generated by a solar power system with a battery backup. We have lighting, fans, dehumidifiers, power tools, a plethora of lab equipment and a good, basic washing …

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop