Subscribe now

Letters archive

Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com


7 September 2022

'Thinking' won't save plants from the axe (1)

From Denis Watkins, St Just in Roseland, Cornwall, UK

You say that extending cognition to plants would mean a seismic shift in our view of humanity's uniqueness ( Leader, 27 August ). No doubt it would to New Scientist readers. But in a world where the Amazon rainforest continues to be felled, would it make any practical difference? We are still far from preventing …

7 September 2022

'Thinking' won't save plants from the axe (2)

From Tim Stevenson, Prestwood, Buckinghamshire, UK

Aha! So the endless contemplation of consciousness has extended to plants! There is an important distinction to be made between consciousness and correlates of consciousness. My consciousness is something I alone experience, and whose explanation I regard as intractable. There are things (correlates) I do that clearly arise from my consciousness. That I observe such …

14 September 2022

I fear new HRT regime will prove to be a pipe dream

From Ruth Lewis, Weston Rhyn, Shropshire, UK

Personalised care for those going through the menopause is a lovely idea, but at the moment I can only think of it as a pipe dream ( 3 September, p 38 ). Right now, I can't get a doctor's appointment to talk about menopause care. This isn't official policy, just the result of having to …

14 September 2022

Quantum rethink throws up incredible possibilities (1)

From Alan Wells, Saltdean, East Sussex, UK

Vlatko Vedral's article about rethinking quantum theory offers the chance of "a route back in time" mediated by the possibility that the "younger and older versions of particle are simply entangled in time" ( 27 August, p 46 ). Of course, this could never be applied to an entire human body, but the theory that …

14 September 2022

Quantum rethink throws up incredible possibilities (2)

From Donald Windsor, Norwich, New York, US

Once a projectile is fired, where it lands seems already determined. Does that mean the landing spot is entangled with the projectile when it was fired from the gun? Is the projectile in the past entangled with itself when it hits the landing spot in the future? Am I, as an older man, entangled with …

14 September 2022

There is a better way to judge food's eco cred

From Geoffrey Patton, Silver Spring, Maryland, US

You described a herculean, reductionist analysis assessing foods' environmental impact ( 13 August, p 13 ). There is another green metric: price. It generally reflects energy and resource inputs. Even if pollution costs are externalised, price can act as an approximate green metric. The challenge is to add externalised costs, such as pollution, to the …

14 September 2022

Give up the eternal chase for a fusion power plant (1)

From Peter Bursztyn, Barrie, Ontario, Canada

I read the article about ignition in a nuclear fusion experiment with dismay ( 20 August, p 12 ). The experiment produced enough energy to sustain itself – theoretically. However, it lasted just "100 trillionths of a second" and couldn't be reproduced. And this is just heat energy. Before it can be truly useful, heat …

14 September 2022

Give up the eternal chase for a fusion power plant (2)

From Alec Mitchell, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Can a nuclear physicist please explain why we are spending so much on the seemingly hopeless quest for a fusion reactor when there is a highly reliable, cost-free one in the sky delivering more than enough fusion power for the entire planet?

14 September 2022

Good reasons why AI won't crack ancient script

From Otta Wenskus, University of Innsbruck, Austria

Maureen Clayson asks whether AI could be used to crack the ancient script known as Linear A ( Letters, 20 August ). The answer is not yet, and probably never, because we have too few texts and they are written in an unknown language. Insufficient data, in other words.

14 September 2022

For the record

The area modelled to assess earthquake risk in California was about 1 million square kilometres (27 August, p 8). We incorrectly stated that isopropanol was an extract of black cohosh. Isopropanol shouldn't be ingested. Extracts of the plant black cohosh have been used to treat menopausal symptoms ( 3 September, p 38 ).

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop