Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
19 June 2019
From Liam O'Keeffe, Abinger Hammer, Surrey, UK
While I agree with your leader about the political response to global warming, I believe that you are too pessimistic when you say that "dealing with climate change comes with a cost". ( 25 May, p 5 ) On the contrary, making the transition to renewable energy is a natural investment. As the price of …
19 June 2019
From Paul McKinley, Dublin, Ireland
I am not sure why Graham Lawton thinks population growth is a taboo subject ( 25 May, p 24 ). I have recently read three books that discuss it and it would seem overpopulation is a battle that is mostly won. A great deal of the world already has a fertility rate at, or below, …
19 June 2019
From Michael Jessop, Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire, UK
You report an illusion whereby three matchboxes together appear to be lighter than the heaviest box on its own ( 25 May, p 13 ). I believe this error occurs because we are comparing the weight of the heaviest box not to the total weight of all three, but to the average weight of them. …
19 June 2019
From Thomas Patrick Reid, Dundee, UK
I have a couple of observations following your article on the matchbox illusion . First, an item of flat pack furniture seems to be far less heavy once assembled. Second, when the head of a pint of Guinness settles, it appears to have gained weight. Could an object's density fool our perception of its weight?
19 June 2019
From David J. Plews, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, UK
I commend Debora MacKenzie's article about Iran's nuclear programme, which points out the unintended consequences of US president Donald Trump's withdrawal from the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action nuclear agreement ( 18 May, p 11 ). However, I was surprised at the line: "the standard inspections the IAEA does in all countries with nuclear …
19 June 2019
From Gareth Ackland, London, UK
I commend your article on the European Parliamentary elections for flagging up the fear of higher environmental taxes, which could only make life disproportionately harder for poorer people ( 25 May, p 23 ). It may fuel populism and encourage the idea that environmentalists are part of an elite. The carbon fee and dividend scheme …
19 June 2019
From Julius Wroblewski, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Your leader about the new space age made me think back to all the starry-eyed dreams of space travel I had as a child, watching space missions and sci-fi programmes on TV ( 18 May, p 5 ). Where is the vacation on the moon that I was promised? Where is the HAL 9000 from …
19 June 2019
From Neil Higgins, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK
I would like to challenge the view of mathematics presented in Peter Bennett's letter on the topic of free will ( Letters, 25 May ). He seems to think that mathematics can only deal with problems that can be described in either a simplistic deterministic way or as the result of entirely random events. He …
19 June 2019
From Neil Doherty, Wilthorpe, South Yorkshire, UK
Continuing the debate on free will that regularly features in New Scientist these days, I am concerned that the scientific costs of this discourse are rising exponentially as more scientists pick a side. I realise that doing science also requires discussion, so that we might progress by such means as well as through experiment and …
19 June 2019
From Andrew Glassner, Seattle, Washington, US
I read your headline "Chinese rover unearths moon's deeper secrets", and I suspect we are being trolled ( 25 May, p 16 ). Surely the proper verb would be "unmoons".