Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
10 October 2018
From Alan Desmond, Shaldon, Devon, UK
You provide an excellent overview of the current scientific evidence on gluten and the complex world of the gut microbiome ( 15 September, p 32 ). I was, however, puzzled by Peter Whorwell's amazement at "how many vegetables people are eating these days". Dietary guidelines in the UK recommend a daily intake of at least …
10 October 2018
From Tom Smith, Saint Louis, France
Pascal Boyer assembles a convincing array of observations on how the general population doesn't understand the economy – or, at least, on how it doesn't share the same understanding as the economists he is familiar with ( 22 September, p 40 ). But behavioural economics has fairly comprehensively killed the idea that we behave anything …
10 October 2018
From Peter Basford, London, UK
Your article on folk economics states that the "wealth pie" being finite is a flawed idea. This is far from self-evident. We have one planet, and we don't account for negative wealth such as forest loss or damage from climate change. Another of the "flawed ideas" discussed is that sellers can fix prices. But corporations …
10 October 2018
From Mark Barrett, Colchester, Essex, UK
You say again that a particle can be "in two places at once" ( 15 September, p 8 ). This is a statement made by an organism that has a theory of the microscopic, which it tries to interpret with the cognitive systems that it has evolved to allow it to survive at a macroscopic …
10 October 2018
From Koos Dering, Amsterdam, Netherlands
. You say the interference pattern may be interpreted as evidence that particles have been in two places at once. But the pattern is also evidence that they have not been "seen" – in quantum jargon, observed – in either place. That would certainly have extinguished the pattern.
10 October 2018
From Guy Cox, St Albans, New South Wales, Australia
Congratulations to Enid Smith for blowing the whistle on washing machines that accept only cold water (Letters, 8 September ). We live off-grid, running on solar power, and our only water supply is what falls on our roof. When we went to buy a washing machine, the only one with a sufficiently low power consumption …
10 October 2018
From Stuart Hubbard, Quarff, Shetland, UK
Smith writes that she was unable to find a washing machine that took warm water from the domestic system. The fact that washing machines need high-pressure water used to mean there was no option but to connect them to the cold water supply. Many houses now have high-pressure hot water systems. If her solar panels …
10 October 2018
From Chris Daniel, Colwyn Bay, UK
Alastair Brotchie laments the loss of his theatrical job to digital technology (Letters, 8 September ). I sympathise with him and others whose livelihoods are replaced by automation and who are excluded from the benefits it brings; but I am optimistic for the future. Humankind has continually found ways of making tasks easier to save …